defining a word造句

• I am looking to define a word-with associated pronounciation.
• You define a word based on what it is called in the dictionary.
• OR-- it makes an unsourced claim about how SI defines a word.
• Defining a word just because it's a majority view is absolutely not neutral.
• Clinton must define success as Humpty Dumpty defined a word, to mean what he chooses it to mean.
• The speaker can quasi-define a word by qualifying the " definiendum " without setting forth what the term actually means.
• Typically, if a Wikipedia articles needs to define a word, it will simply cite the definition from other dictionaries; anything less would be original research.
• One word of advice-wikipedia frowns upon " dictionary definitions " of words ( that is, articles which just define a word the way a dictionary would ).
• Another aspect of this is parenthetical expressions; they're defined as words in a sentence that can safely be removed without causing any damage to the main sense.
• When defining a word, the definition should not be inferred based on the number of sources that support the statement, but " actually taken from a dictionary ".
• Uh . . . my sister and I have been discussing agglutinative, isolative, and inflectional languages, and it got me thinking . . . how do you define a word anyways?
• I say no, for 3 reasons : ( 1 ) As Hetar says above, WP : NOT says that Wikipedia is not a dictionary and entries that just define a word do not belong.
• In recent years, linguists have used corpus linguistics and Lexicographers have often failed to allow for semantic prosody when defining a word, although with the recent development and increasing use of computers, the field of corpus linguistics is now being combined with that of lexicography.
• The purpose of the article is not to define a word, but to show how such a trendy word came to be, its origins, what it means, and how it has spread . talk ) 08 : 46, 16 October 2010 ( UTC)
• More snarky than mean-spirited, " Best Week Ever " ( Friday nights ) is made up of several segments, including " Sizzler, " which tackles the week's celebrity gossip, and " Word of the Week, " which defines a word, real or made up, that captures a cultural phenomenon.
• I believe we should do what dictionaries do when they define a word : we look at prominent sources like the New York Times, the New York Review of Books, the London Times, the Economist, the Wall Street Journal, Academic journals, scholarly writing, popular novels, etc to see how the word is used.
• If you define a word orthographically as being separated by spaces or certain types of punctuation, then you would conclude that " governor-general " and " governor general " were different and I suppose also " login " or " log-in " as different from " log in ".
• It introduces irregular words and more tricky words ( defined as words which cannot be pronounced phonically  English has a surprisingly large number of these, usually the commonest words of all such as'to','of', etc . ) slowly and systematically after a thorough introduction of the transparent alphabet code ( learning the 44 letter / s-sound correspondences to automaticity and how to blend for reading and segment for spelling ).